Kitkat Kernels for All (well most!)

[d33]

THis is from my 't' device running at 1800 CPU / 720 DDR (AnTuTu - 20,500)

<4>[ 0.733989] efuse_version_val: efuse version = 51
<4>[ 0.734035] DVFS MSG: core: dvfs_adjust_table_lmtvolt get leakage_level = 6000
<4>[ 0.734099] adjust table freq=1800000 KHz, index=1375000 mV to index=1350000 mV
<4>[ 0.734207] efuse_version_val: efuse version = 51
<4>[ 0.734252] DVFS MSG: aclk_gpu: dvfs_adjust_table_lmtvolt get leakage_level = 6000
<6>[ 0.735174] CPU is ROCKCHIP RK3188T
<6>[ 0.735210] NEOMODE the eFuses are (22) = 2b and (23) = 2

[d33]

Temporary link to a test kernel for those that want camera support

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/16263143/kernel_T_16_Cameratest.zip

It is a 'T' override kernel clocked to 1.6 / 667 so may not be stable on some T kernels.

Test you cameras and let me know if any work.

Make / model / chipset would be useful

[yerzu]

Thank you!
The old wifi sticks dont get much love lately (understandably so).
Anyone tested it on mk802iv or similar sticks with old wifi?
My parents are using the stick and I cant really let them test it.

Yes I have mk802iv with rtl8188eu (old wifi) and d33 made kernels for this config (post #1) for my request or if You wanna You can check my kernels tested directly by me on these stick.

[yerzu]

ignore

[vkk]

Yes I have mk802iv with rtl8188eu (old wifi) and d33 made kernels for this config (post #1) for my request or if You wanna You can check my kernels tested directly by me on these stick.

You mean you tested them and they are stable for daily usage?
No crushes, reboots, FC, smooth video etc?
If you can upload yours that would be awesome

[petro_ionut]

Re: Kitkat Kernels for All (well most!)

It seems to suggest it detected two partitions; SDA1 and SDA2 with the second containing a logical partition SDA5. What does "fdisk -l /dev/sda" give?

Looks to me to be ROM related, not kernel?


Using my ipad so apols for any stupid ios spelling 'corrections'

Thanks for interest, i will look up later today, after work!

Sent from my HTC One

[JDfense]

AW: Kitkat Kernels for All (well most!)

Man... You belong to ROM Developers group and You messed up units please correct these KHz

Thanks for your advice, yerzu.

JDfense --->I8160

[ididmytime]

Thanks for everything d33.

Just got a CX919 very cheaply, but to my disappointment it is a T model.

The CPU not hitting the dizzy heights of 1.9ghz I can live with, but when my overclocked mk808 can run XBMC in native 1080p at 60fps, yet my CK919 can only 40fps it is disappointing to say the least.

Your efforts are appreciated. I hope the GPU situation gets sorted out for all involved.

[d33]

Kitkat Kernels for All (well most!)

Thanks for everything d33.

Just got a CX919 very cheaply, but to my disappointment it is a T model.

The CPU not hitting the dizzy heights of 1.9ghz I can live with, but when my overclocked mk808 can run XBMC in native 1080p at 60fps, yet my CK919 can only 40fps it is disappointing to say the least.

What's the maximum CPU / DDR frequencies you have managed to get on your device?

Can you post your best, stable result along with the leakage level bit from DMESG?



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ididmytime]

What's the maximum CPU / DDR frequencies you have managed to get on your device?

Can you post your best, stable result along with the leakage level bit from DMESG?



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I believe I was hitting 1.6ghz comfortably, didn't push it too much since CPU overclocking isn't my main gripe as it will be used purely as a XBMC device, even underclocked it's overkill for it. I don't mind testing a few kernels however, as they are so much easier to flash with the button on the side.

I will post results from DMESG and do some more testing when I get a chance at some point, the least I can do considering your efforts.

[yerzu]

You mean you tested them and they are stable for daily usage?
No crushes, reboots, FC, smooth video etc?
If you can upload yours that would be awesome

http://www.freaktab.com/showthread.php?11243-720P-kernels-with-ASIX-ax88179_178a-working-driver-for-Finless-KitKat-2-0-ROM

[ididmytime]

<4>[ 0.739474] DVFS MSG: core: dvfs_adjust_table_lmtvolt get leakage_level = 5000
<4>[ 0.739539] adjust table freq=1800000 KHz, index=1375000 mV to index=1350000 mV
<4>[ 0.739609] efuse_version_val: efuse version = 51
<4>[ 0.739652] DVFS MSG: aclk_gpu: dvfs_adjust_table_lmtvolt get leakage_level = 5000
<6>[ 0.740560] CPU is ROCKCHIP RK3188T
<6>[ 0.740596] NEOMODE the eFuses are (22) = 2b and (23) = 1
<4>[ 0.740975] rk3188 cpufreq version 2.2, suspend freq 1200 MHz


Max stable like for many others is 1.6ghz.

[d33]

<4>[ 0.739474] DVFS MSG: core: dvfs_adjust_table_lmtvolt get leakage_level = 5000
<4>[ 0.739539] adjust table freq=1800000 KHz, index=1375000 mV to index=1350000 mV
<4>[ 0.739609] efuse_version_val: efuse version = 51
<4>[ 0.739652] DVFS MSG: aclk_gpu: dvfs_adjust_table_lmtvolt get leakage_level = 5000
<6>[ 0.740560] CPU is ROCKCHIP RK3188T
<6>[ 0.740596] NEOMODE the eFuses are (22) = 2b and (23) = 1
<4>[ 0.740975] rk3188 cpufreq version 2.2, suspend freq 1200 MHz

Max stable like for many others is 1.6ghz.

Thanks for that - not seeing an obvious correllation between performance and leakage level/eFuse yet but perhaps it will be more apparent when more people post their results.

[petro_ionut]

It seems to suggest it detected two partitions; SDA1 and SDA2 with the second containing a logical partition SDA5. What does "fdisk -l /dev/sda" give?

Looks to me to be ROM related, not kernel?


Using my ipad so apols for any stupid ios spelling 'corrections'

This is my results:

u0_a94@m0:/ $ su
root@m0:/ # fdisk -l
root@m0:/ # fdisk -l /dev/block/sda


Disk /dev/block/sda: 500.0 GB, 500074283008 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60797 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes


Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/block/sda1 * 2 1986 15944481 7 HPFS/NTFS
/dev/block/sda2 1987 60798 472393247+ f Win95 Ext'd (LBA)
/dev/block/sda5 1987 60798 472393216 7 HPFS/NTFS
root@m0:/ #


Can you tell me this kernel is safe to write: kernel_T_AP6210_HD_cpu1704h_gpu798h_ddrstock.img

[d33]

Can you tell me this kernel is safe to write: kernel_T_AP6210_HD_cpu1704h_gpu798h_ddrstock.img

That isn't the output of fdisk!

I cannot tell you anything is safe or not. You must chose.