Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
New Products soon to be released
Collapse
X
-
Your new device MUST support Widevine Level 1 AND HDCP 1.x or more. It should also passthrough HD audio natively, such as Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD Master Audio. It should support Android TV OS, with lean back launcher. A must by today's standard is Gigabit Ethernet. Of course a Bluetooth Voice Remote wold be icing on the cake. If these simple items are not met, fire your head honcho that makes the decisions on what to include in your new devices.MK818B, T428, ATV 1220, CS918S, TV01, S89H, R89, ADT-1, MK808B Plus, MINIX X8-H Plus, Tronsmart Orion R68
Comment
-
Here is example of passive cooled device... ( its cirrus7, a device that was that announced..but never got made?)
https://www.cirrus7.com/blog/cirrus7...elease-plan-en
make the layers black/red aluminium ( or chrome/white with inside a rgb led.. for some mood indirect light )
or some retro looking design's
just a thought... goodluck
Ps
It's hard to think about designing a box without any dimensions (mm/cm )Last edited by mitchell4you; 05 April 2018, 23:15.
Comment
-
Priority 1
As has already been mentioned, the support element requires a major overhaul as it is poor at best and I have lost count of the number of times that I have contacted your support team, only to receive a string of broken promises, also evident from the abysmal support on your own forums, so unless you get this right then the Beelink name will plunge further into disrepute and lack respect and fewer orders for products.
Design, testing and production
Rather than just release a box, which will all too often result in design flaws and firmware so incomplete that it can takes many months for somebody (usually an independent developer) to resolve some of the issues.
So carry out the process in this order.
1. Send out pre-production models to a couple of dozen users (for which there are plenty to choose from on this forum alone) for them to test, evaluate and report back on design/hardware/firmware issues and improvements that should be present in a final product. This should include developers that can actively assist you in developing firmware, who should also be given direct, 2 way communication with your head of firmware development and access to all software SDK resources. Beelink should choose the evaluators based upon who you have confidence in, rather than the old tried way of asking people to come forward, some of who will provide no useful feedback whatsoever.
Evaluation should be based on a set of specific conditions that can easily be produced based on many years of experience from feedback and complaints already received and then allow for other, less specific areas for people to give feedback for.
2. Make the appropriate changes to hardware/design and firmware to the satisfaction of all evaluators and additionally, do not be afraid to say that x or y functionality that does not work at the time of release and have a firm commitment for them to be resolved at the earliest possible time. Each firmware release can be evaluated in the same manner by the same people, in addition to others that will have purchased the item.
3. Release the product only when evaluators feel that it is ready for global use.
There are so many basic things that can easily be listed as being of importance to the quality and functionality of a product, so it should not be difficult to produce this after so many years of TV box production and use.
R-TV BOX S10, Beebox N3150, Chuwi Hibox, Nvidia Shield, A95X Max
Comment
-
Originally posted by ang89gunner View PostPlease support for your customer problem.
Many many problem not respond.
http://freaktab.com/forum/tv-player-...x/gt1-ultimate
Comment
-
Originally posted by clarkss12 View PostYour new device MUST support Widevine Level 1 AND HDCP 1.x or more. It should also passthrough HD audio natively, such as Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD Master Audio. It should support Android TV OS, with lean back launcher. A must by today's standard is Gigabit Ethernet. Of course a Bluetooth Voice Remote wold be icing on the cake. If these simple items are not met, fire your head honcho that makes the decisions on what to include in your new devices.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ang89gunner View PostPlease support for your customer problem.
Many many problem not respond.
http://freaktab.com/forum/tv-player-...x/gt1-ultimate
Comment
-
Originally posted by bluesmanuk View PostPriority 1
As has already been mentioned, the support element requires a major overhaul as it is poor at best and I have lost count of the number of times that I have contacted your support team, only to receive a string of broken promises, also evident from the abysmal support on your own forums, so unless you get this right then the Beelink name will plunge further into disrepute and lack respect and fewer orders for products.
Design, testing and production
Rather than just release a box, which will all too often result in design flaws and firmware so incomplete that it can takes many months for somebody (usually an independent developer) to resolve some of the issues.
So carry out the process in this order.
1. Send out pre-production models to a couple of dozen users (for which there are plenty to choose from on this forum alone) for them to test, evaluate and report back on design/hardware/firmware issues and improvements that should be present in a final product. This should include developers that can actively assist you in developing firmware, who should also be given direct, 2 way communication with your head of firmware development and access to all software SDK resources. Beelink should choose the evaluators based upon who you have confidence in, rather than the old tried way of asking people to come forward, some of who will provide no useful feedback whatsoever.
Evaluation should be based on a set of specific conditions that can easily be produced based on many years of experience from feedback and complaints already received and then allow for other, less specific areas for people to give feedback for.
2. Make the appropriate changes to hardware/design and firmware to the satisfaction of all evaluators and additionally, do not be afraid to say that x or y functionality that does not work at the time of release and have a firm commitment for them to be resolved at the earliest possible time. Each firmware release can be evaluated in the same manner by the same people, in addition to others that will have purchased the item.
3. Release the product only when evaluators feel that it is ready for global use.
There are so many basic things that can easily be listed as being of importance to the quality and functionality of a product, so it should not be difficult to produce this after so many years of TV box production and use.
Comment
-
Originally posted by digitalriver View PostAnd where the support of older products? For example, beelink r89???
Comment
-
Originally posted by bluesmanuk View PostPriority 1
As has already been mentioned, the support element requires a major overhaul as it is poor at best and I have lost count of the number of times that I have contacted your support team, only to receive a string of broken promises, also evident from the abysmal support on your own forums, so unless you get this right then the Beelink name will plunge further into disrepute and lack respect and fewer orders for products.
Design, testing and production
Rather than just release a box, which will all too often result in design flaws and firmware so incomplete that it can takes many months for somebody (usually an independent developer) to resolve some of the issues.
So carry out the process in this order.
1. Send out pre-production models to a couple of dozen users (for which there are plenty to choose from on this forum alone) for them to test, evaluate and report back on design/hardware/firmware issues and improvements that should be present in a final product. This should include developers that can actively assist you in developing firmware, who should also be given direct, 2 way communication with your head of firmware development and access to all software SDK resources. Beelink should choose the evaluators based upon who you have confidence in, rather than the old tried way of asking people to come forward, some of who will provide no useful feedback whatsoever.
Evaluation should be based on a set of specific conditions that can easily be produced based on many years of experience from feedback and complaints already received and then allow for other, less specific areas for people to give feedback for.
2. Make the appropriate changes to hardware/design and firmware to the satisfaction of all evaluators and additionally, do not be afraid to say that x or y functionality that does not work at the time of release and have a firm commitment for them to be resolved at the earliest possible time. Each firmware release can be evaluated in the same manner by the same people, in addition to others that will have purchased the item.
3. Release the product only when evaluators feel that it is ready for global use.
There are so many basic things that can easily be listed as being of importance to the quality and functionality of a product, so it should not be difficult to produce this after so many years of TV box production and use.
Comment
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 4624 users online. 1 members and 4623 guests.
Most users ever online was 37,478 at 04:14 on 26 June 2024.
Comment