Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pipo M9 Max RileyROM 2.0
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by fztt View PostHow much is battery life affected by OC?but above is with wider range of brightness kernel and I'm using my tab on low brightness level. So that may be the reason for nearly 2 times more battery life. I don't see another explanation for such unbelievable result. May be low brightness in conjunction with slightly undervolted CPU leads to that power efficiency. It feels like new device , its ~2x faster and ~2x battery life.
Or may be the reason is that it sleeps like a baby now, see the stats, they show adequate awake and sleep status, not like on stock kernel. And WiFi was on all the timeBRILLIANT , wake me up, too good to be true
12 hours of use with 3.40h of screen on drained unbelievable 20%. that estimates for ~18.3h screen on time. That is just ... wake me up.
As for overclocking , it is not overclocked actually. It uses 528mhz DDR freq, which is stock for pipo m8hd. But on m8hd it uses 1250mv , but in my kernel it runs on 1150mv, undervolted. Also I've found a bug in sources which may have led to high battery drain. Practice is very promising as for now.Last edited by dnkn; 31 October 2013, 13:22.
Comment
-
Originally posted by spectra9 View Postdnkn, any plan to release the 696mhz & 768mhz ddr version of the kernel?
Comment
-
Re: Pipo M9 Max RileyROM 2.0
Originally posted by dnkn View PostNot sure yet, as I'm using it very hard. But yesterday I used it hard for ~7 hours, 49% left. So it seems to be more power effective
As for overclocking , it is not overclocked actually. It uses 528mhz DDR freq, which is stock for pipo m8hd. But on m8hd it uses 1250mv , but in my kernel it runs on 1150mv, undervolted. Also I've found a bug in sources which may have led to high battery drain. Practice is very promising as for now.
Enviado desde mi SII con patatatalk4
Comment
-
Originally posted by CiDsTaR View PostHow about kernel mods @ old pcb devices?
Enviado desde mi SII con patatatalk4
Is there any info available on this subject?
Comment
-
Re: Pipo M9 Max RileyROM 2.0
Originally posted by dnkn View PostI don't think its possible as I have no idea what are the differences between v1 and others.
Is there any info available on this subject?
Comment
-
696
696mhz/1250mv (1250mv is stock voltage for 528mhz ddr on m8hd) ddr kernel.
Kernel is with wide brightness range,some devices may encounter flickering on low brightness levels,if so,then please connect via usb (usb debugging should be on). and run an pc (in folder with adb,usually can be found in Tsparky root scripts) this command adb shell cat /proc/kmsg then enter display options and change brightness to the level on which you have flickering and watch the screen on pc, there should be messages, I'm interested in the value after "real is" . report the value in my thread.
With auto brightness there may be flickering as the OS needs to be tweaked for new values.
kernel696.zip
Comment
-
Originally posted by dnkn View PostNot sure yet, as I'm using it very hard. But yesterday I used it hard for ~7 hours, 49% left. So it seems to be more power effectivebut above is with wider range of brightness kernel and I'm using my tab on low brightness level. So that may be the reason for nearly 2 times more battery life. I don't see another explanation for such unbelievable result. May be low brightness in conjunction with slightly undervolted CPU leads to that power efficiency. It feels like new device , its ~2x faster and ~2x battery life.
Or may be the reason is that it sleeps like a baby now, see the stats, they show adequate awake and sleep status, not like on stock kernel. And WiFi was on all the timeBRILLIANT , wake me up, too good to be true
[ATTACH=CONFIG]3738[/ATTACH]
As for overclocking , it is not overclocked actually. It uses 528mhz DDR freq, which is stock for pipo m8hd. But on m8hd it uses 1250mv , but in my kernel it runs on 1150mv, undervolted. Also I've found a bug in sources which may have led to high battery drain. Practice is very promising as for now.
Comment
-
dnkn, thanks for 696 kernel, will test it and if it works fine, I may be tempted to ask for a 768 version.
Comparing the checksum from Riley's 2.1, it seems the kernel included is the one on post #40 in your thread, the original attachment name is kernel_rkcrc.zip. Can you tell us what's the difference between this one and the lower brightness version in post #38? So far I'm counting 4 kernels you've released to date, including the 696 version
Comment
-
Originally posted by spectra9 View Postdnkn, thanks for 696 kernel, will test it and if it works fine, I may be tempted to ask for a 768 version.
Comparing the checksum from Riley's 2.1, it seems the kernel included is the one on post #40 in your thread, the original attachment name is kernel_rkcrc.zip. Can you tell us what's the difference between this one and the lower brightness version in post #38? So far I'm counting 4 kernels you've released to date, including the 696 version
Comment
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 2214 users online. 0 members and 2214 guests.
Most users ever online was 63,956 at 18:56 on 20 March 2025.
Comment